By Guangwu Feng
The general target of this booklet is to strengthen a Gricean theoretical framework of traditional implicature in which chinese language pragmatic markers might be accommodated. It has associated ambitions. to begin with it units out to enhance a idea of traditional implicature. traditional implicature is itself a hugely debatable time period, understood very in a different way via quite a few manufacturers of latest pragmatic concept, and is a pivotal inspiration within the debates among the Gricean and Neo-Gricean theorists at the one hand and proponents of Relevance conception at the different. This e-book bargains an exemplary research and definition of what's excited about those present debates, and it either clarifies and 'problematises' a wide range of linked matters. the second one target is to supply a principled and systematic research of pragmatic markers in chinese language. Markers of this kind (and a number of interconnnected different types together with discourse debris) were the topic of excessive research lately, and this specified research of chinese language markers is a contribution during this quarter that is of considerable value, either theoretical and empirical.
Read Online or Download A Theory of Conventional Implicature & Pragmatic Markers in Chinese PDF
Best semantics books
This is often the 1st textbook that methods traditional language semantics and good judgment from the viewpoint of Discourse illustration conception, an process which emphasizes the dynamic and incremental points of that means and inference. The e-book has been conscientiously designed for the study room. it truly is geared toward scholars with various levels of training, together with these with no earlier publicity to semantics or formal common sense.
'Multidimensional Semantics of Evaluative Adverbs' presents a multidimensional research for the lexical semantics of evaluative adverbs: nonfactive evaluative adverbs set off a traditional implicature, while, factive evaluative adverbs not just set off a standard implicature but additionally a standard presupposition.
This booklet offers an creation to compositional semantics and to the syntax/semantics interface. it's rooted in the culture of version theoretic semantics, and develops an specific fragment of either the syntax and semantics of a wealthy element of English. Professor Jacobson adopts an immediate Compositionality technique, wherein the syntax builds the expressions whereas the semantics at the same time assigns every one a model-theoretic interpretation.
A groundbreaking number of essays taking a look at the suggestions of 'intermediality' and 'multimodality' - the connection among numerous kinds of artwork and new media - and together with case experiences starting from tune, movie and structure to medieval ballads, biopoetry and Lettrism.
- Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition (Open linguistics series)
- A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics
- Discourse (Language Teaching: A Scheme for Teacher Education)
- Metonymy and Language: A New Theory of Linguistic Processing
- Meaning and Partiality
- Using Russian Synonyms
Extra resources for A Theory of Conventional Implicature & Pragmatic Markers in Chinese
According to Levinson (2000: 17), a generalized conversational implicature is a shared inference. For example any statement of the form ‘‘some x are G’’ will, other things being equal, have the default interpretation ‘‘not all x are G’’. As the semantic content of the lexical item some, this default interpretation cannot be mistaken though it can be cancelled or suspended, or reinforced without semantic redundancy. ’’ Levinson’s theory of generalized conversational implicature is intended to provide an explanation of the miracle that people can effortlessly recover the speaker’s intention from quite sketchy linguistic forms.
2 What is Said Versus Conventional Implicature Grice’s continuous effort to avoid confusion between what is said and conventional implicature also lends support to my view that his real concern is with the distinction between what is said and what is implicated. This effort started from his William James lectures and continued to his (1989) Retrospective Epilogue. To say what is said is closely related to the conventional meaning of words is not paramount to saying that the conventional content of a sentence uttered can be identiﬁed with what is said.
In technical terms, the utterance is apparently against the maxims of relation and quantity in the given context. Under the assumption that the professor is able to provide adequate information about Bill’s ability in philosophy and has no reasons to refuse to do so, the hearer may well infer that he is implying something beyond or different from the literal meanings of the words used. He may implicate, for example that Bill is poor at philosophy, thus unsuitable for the position. For one reason or another he does not straightforwardly say so.
A Theory of Conventional Implicature & Pragmatic Markers in Chinese by Guangwu Feng